The New York law the court is reviewing has been in place since 1913 and says that to carry a concealed handgun in public for self-defense, a person applying for a license has to demonstrate “proper cause,” an actual need to carry the weapon. One gun case the justices did agree to hear ended anticlimactically in 2020 when the justices threw out the case.īut following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg last year and her replacement by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court agreed to wade into the gun debate again.Įric Tirschwell, the legal director at Everytown for Gun Safety, said there’s “reason to be concerned” for groups like his that “a type of law that the court was not interested in or willing to review in the past, they now are.” The fact that the high court is hearing a gun rights case at all is a change after years in which it routinely turned them away. The justices could decide whether those laws, “may issue” laws, can stand. But about half a dozen states, including populous California and several Eastern states, restrict the carrying of guns to those who can demonstrate a particular need for doing so. The question isn’t an issue in most of the country, where gun owners have little difficulty legally carrying their weapons when they go out. The question for the court now is whether there’s a similar Second Amendment right to carry a firearm in public. Those decisions established a nationwide right to keep a gun at home for self-defense. The court last issued major gun rights decisions in 20. “The stakes really could not be higher,” said Jonathan Lowy, chief counsel at the gun control group Brady.

Gun control advocates acknowledge the court’s composition has them concerned about the outcome. They want the court to say the New York law is too restrictive, as are similar laws in other states. Gun rights advocates hope that the court with a 6-3 conservative majority is poised to side with them. Gun rights groups, meanwhile, say the risk of a confrontation is precisely why they have a right to be armed for self-defense. Gun control groups say if a high court ruling requires states to drop restrictions, the result will be more violence. The case centers on New York’s restrictive gun permit law and whether challengers to the law have a right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense. The case the justices will hear Wednesday comes as gun violence has surged, and it could dramatically increase the number of people eligible to carry firearms as they go about their daily lives. WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court is preparing to hear a gun rights case that could lead to more guns on the streets of New York and Los Angeles and threaten restrictions on guns in subways, airports, bars, churches, schools and other places where people gather.

Half life 1 guns